Skip to main content
Home/AI workshop generator for live, facilitated training sessions
ISAI generator

AI workshop generator for live, facilitated training sessions

Intle's AI workshop generator turns a plain-language brief into a reviewable interactive-session draft — polls, word clouds, think-pair-share rounds, scored checkpoints and facilitator notes, structured for a live room rather than solo e-learning. Run it as a hosted session that participants join from a link on their own devices, or export it as a SCORM 2004 or 1.2 package for LMS testing. It is built for trainers, lecturers and L&D teams who facilitate sessions rather than assign courses.

See a live example

A real generated interactive session

This was generated from one brief and passes the same quality gates every package does. Click through it — every section is live.

IS

Interactive preview

Interactive Session · 11 sections · Fully interactive

Answered
0/4
Correct
0
Time
0:00

Essay Draft Under Scrutiny

Scenario
4 min
You submit a first-year essay after asking an AI tool to draft two body paragraphs. A friend also sends you the structure they used for the same assignment, and you keep several useful phrases from sources without citing them. An integrity investigation would not focus on only one issue here: it would consider authorship, whether the work is truly independent, and whether every borrowed idea or wording is clearly credited.

Participant checklist

0 / 2 steps completed

  1. Read the case and identify which action worries you most.
    Reflect
  2. Compare your choice with someone near you and explain why.
    DiscussFacilitator confirms
  • Academic integrity concerns often involve more than one behaviour at once.
  • Investigations usually examine authorship, collaboration, and attribution together.

Scenario actions and likely risk areas

Use this case to discuss which choices may trigger an academic integrity concern.

Student actionPossible risk areaWhy it matters
AI drafts paragraphsAuthorship concernWork may no longer be the ownIf submitted largely unchanged
Friend shares structureCollusion riskAnother student's plan shapesIndependent work may be lost
Uses uncited phrasesPlagiarism riskSource language is unatrrib.Reader cannot see what was
Checks module rules firstLower risk practiceShows rule awarenessHelps decide if support is
Made with intle.co.uk

What every generated package includes

Live participation blocks

Polls with live result bar charts, word clouds capped at three words per participant with a profanity filter, and flip-through flashcard decks that carry a hint on every card. The live example opens with a student case and a four-option poll — run before the rules are explained, so the group commits to a view first — then, after the rules reading, gathers a word cloud of each participant's first referencing step.

Timed think-pair-share rounds

Structured think, pair and share phases with per-phase timings and instructions. In the live example, participants get 90 seconds to judge an AI-use case alone, 150 seconds to compare judgements with a partner, and 90 seconds to share one agreed boundary with the room.

Scored checkpoints in varied response modes

Multi-select, short-text with accepted alternative answers, and true/false questions — the quality gates require response-mode variety, so a session cannot ship as a wall of identical multiple-choice. Every question carries an explanation covering why the answer is right, the common mistake, and the policy or regulation it rests on.

Decision scenarios with graded consequences

Participants choose a course of action and see the consequence, rated optimal or poor, with a regulation reference attached. The live example pairs its decision point with a four-step flowchart showing the checks to run before using AI-generated text.

Facilitator notes on every section

Run guidance written for the person at the front — when to run the poll, what to probe, which misconceptions to correct. All 11 sections of the live example carry them, and they are stripped from learner-facing SCORM output, so your script never ships to learners.

A scored close with a pass mark

Scored sections roll into a final assessment with a configurable pass mark — the live example rolls four scored sections (three questions and a decision) into a 70% pass mark with review allowed. On SCORM export, each scored item is reported to your LMS as a tracked interaction.

How it works

  1. 1

    Describe the workshop

    Write a brief in plain language — topic, audience, duration — up to 5,000 characters, and optionally attach sources: PDF, DOCX, PPTX, images or a URL. Intle's classifier detects that you want an interactive session, or you can set the type explicitly. Typical sessions run 15 to 45 minutes.

  2. 2

    Review the structure before generation

    Intle proposes a section-by-section running order — where the polls, discussion rounds, readings and scored checks sit — and you approve or adjust it before any content is written, so you correct the shape while it is still cheap to change.

  3. 3

    Generation with quality gates

    Every interactive session must clear automated density checks: at least half its sections interactive, no long non-interactive streaks, a minimum visual density, and variety in question response modes. Violations trigger an automatic repair pass, and structural failures block delivery rather than shipping a flat session.

  4. 4

    Deliver as a hosted session or SCORM

    Hosted sessions are the primary mode for this type: participants join from a link with no accounts or LMS enrolment, and responses appear as they come in. Or export formats targeting SCORM 2004 4th Edition or 1.2; dated package-level evidence and current per-platform status are published on the LMS compatibility page.

What teams build with it

  • University lecturers running first-year seminars — the live example is a 30-minute academic integrity and responsible AI session with a poll, word cloud, paired case discussion and four scored sections (three questions and a decision) at a 70% pass mark.
  • L&D facilitators turning a policy change into a facilitated 30-minute session for line managers, with decision points and graded consequences instead of a read-and-acknowledge slide deck.
  • Freelance trainers and consultants building client workshops from the client's own material — upload their slides or policy PDFs and the generated session is grounded in them.
  • Onboarding and induction teams running mixed in-room and remote sessions, where remote joiners answer the same polls and prompts from their own devices on the same footing as the room.

Frequently asked questions

Can a live workshop really be exported as a SCORM package?

Yes. Interactive sessions export as SCORM 2004 4th Edition or SCORM 1.2 zips, with scored sections reported as tracked interactions and facilitator notes stripped from the learner-facing output. That said, hosted delivery is the primary mode for this content type — if most of the value sits in live group response, run it hosted and use the SCORM export where LMS tracking is required.

Which LMS platforms are supported?

Packages target SCORM 2004 4th Edition and SCORM 1.2. We deliberately do not claim any named LMS is verified until the public matrix records an executed test; that page also identifies the dated build behind package-level evidence.

Can I edit the session before running it?

Yes, at two points. Before generation you review and adjust the proposed running order; after generation, a visual editor lets you rewrite prompts, answers, facilitator notes and timings, reorder sections, and re-export. Edits automatically trigger repackaging, so the SCORM zip and the hosted session stay in sync.

How does scoring work in an interactive session?

Polls, word clouds and think-pair-share rounds are participation activities and are not scored. Question and decision sections carry weightings and roll into a final assessment with a pass mark — the live example rolls four scored sections (three questions and a decision) into a 70% pass mark with review allowed. Hosted sessions record per-participant responses you can review afterwards; SCORM exports report each scored item to the LMS as an interaction.

Is there a free plan?

Yes. The free plan generates complete interactive sessions with the same structure and quality gates; outputs retain the Intle credit, and hosted sessions on the free plan stay live for 7 days, with paid plans extending that substantially. Every plan, including free, supports at least 20 participants per session.

Generate and review your own draft

Describe what you want to teach. Download a SCORM package for your LMS or share a hosted session link — free to start, no card required.