Education & AcademiaInteractive SessionHigher education teaching staff

Training examples for universities & schools

Example detail

Reviewed for UX clarity and content quality

Academic Integrity and Responsible AI: Student Decisions in Practice

A ready-to-run interactive seminar on academic integrity and responsible AI use for first-year undergraduates, mixing live polls and paired discussion with scored knowledge checks.

Structure

Screens with 4 interactive checkpoints

Difficulty

Intermediate

30 minute runtime

Delivery

Export

Hosted-first + SCORM plus SCORM package downloads

Generate something like this

Interactive preview

Interactive Session · 11 sections · Fully interactive

Answered

0/4

Correct

Time

0:00

Essay Draft Under Scrutiny

Scenario

4 min

You submit a first-year essay after asking an AI tool to draft two body paragraphs. A friend also sends you the structure they used for the same assignment, and you keep several useful phrases from sources without citing them. An integrity investigation would not focus on only one issue here: it would consider authorship, whether the work is truly independent, and whether every borrowed idea or wording is clearly credited.

Participant checklist

0 / 2 steps completed

Read the case and identify which action worries you most.
Reflect
Compare your choice with someone near you and explain why.
DiscussFacilitator confirms

Academic integrity concerns often involve more than one behaviour at once.
Investigations usually examine authorship, collaboration, and attribution together.

Scenario actions and likely risk areas

Use this case to discuss which choices may trigger an academic integrity concern.

Student action	Possible risk area	Why it matters
AI drafts paragraphs	Authorship concern	Work may no longer be the own	If submitted largely unchanged
Friend shares structure	Collusion risk	Another student's plan shapes	Independent work may be lost
Uses uncited phrases	Plagiarism risk	Source language is unatrrib.	Reader cannot see what was
Checks module rules first	Lower risk practice	Shows rule awareness	Helps decide if support is

Prompt in

Create an interactive seminar session for first-year undergraduates on academic integrity and responsible AI use: what counts as plagiarism and collusion, when AI tools are and are not acceptable, referencing basics, and the consequences of misconduct. Use polls, word clouds, and paired discussion around realistic student cases.

Why this example is strong

Quality review

Audience fit

Curated for higher education teaching staff with a intermediate learning curve.

Interaction mix

4 interactive checkpoints across context, poll, reading, word cloud, flashcard, think pair share, question, decision, feedback.

Prompt fidelity

One brief became an 11-section live seminar: a results-live poll, a word cloud, five referencing flashcards, a timed think-pair-share, a branching AI-rewrite decision with consequence panels, and four scored checks at a 70% pass mark.

Delivery format

Hosted-first + SCORM plus a reusable prompt seed for your review workflow.

Learning objectives

Understand the key principles of academic integrity

Identify critical aspects of responsible AI use

Apply plagiarism vs collusion concepts in practice

Demonstrate awareness of referencing basics requirements

Section walkthrough

What the learner sees

Navigate through sections using the interactive preview above.11 screens with 4 interactive checkpoints.

Regulation context

Compliance references carried into the output

Typical university academic integrity regulations on unauthorised collaboration and misrepresentation of authorship.

Standard academic referencing conventions used in university assessment policies and study skills guidance.

Typical university academic misconduct procedures covering plagiarism, intent, and penalty decisions.

Typical university academic integrity and assessment-misconduct procedures

Related examples

Keep browsing adjacent use cases.

View the full gallery

Education & AcademiaScenario

Year 9 Safeguarding Disclosure: Teacher Decision Path

A branching decision-path scenario that lets secondary teachers rehearse a Year 9 safeguarding disclosure — from a pupil's first words to the DSL handoff — before it happens for real.

7-node branching path5 scored checks80% pass mark

Education & AcademiaIcebreaker

First Seminar Spark: Names, Hopes, and Anonymous Worries

A ten-minute first-seminar icebreaker for a new undergraduate group that moves from saying names to sharing module hopes to airing worries anonymously.

4 response modes3 visual sections10-minute runtime

Build your own version

Start from this prompt and make it yours.

Use this as an illustrative starting point, then generate and review a version tailored to your team, policy context and delivery workflow.

Get started free