Example detail
Stored learning example with evidence status below
Year 9 Safeguarding Disclosure: Teacher Decision Path
A branching decision-path scenario that lets secondary teachers rehearse a Year 9 safeguarding disclosure, from a pupil's first words to the DSL handoff, before it happens for real.
Structure
9
Screens with 5 interactive checkpoints
Difficulty
Intermediate
About 20 minutes, estimated from the example data
Delivery
Preview
Interactive learner preview and on-demand SCORM 2004 package
What this example proves
Section types in this stored example: context, scenario graph, flashcard, question, decision, feedback. Later edits not independently recorded. SCORM 2004 generated on download request; no per-example lms test recorded. Preview and package creation do not establish learner outcomes.
Interactive preview
Scenario · 9 sections · Fully interactive
A pupil asks you to keep a disclosure secret
- Stay calm and let the pupil speak in their own words.
- Do not promise confidentiality or start investigating.
- Record facts and report promptly to the DSL or deputy.
Teacher response from disclosure to report
A high-level path showing the immediate safeguarding actions expected when a pupil begins to disclose harm.
Read diagram as text
- Pupil starts talking leads to Listen calmly.
- Listen calmly leads to Reassure support.
- Reassure support leads to Explain no secrecy.
- Explain no secrecy leads to Record exact words.
- Record exact words leads to Report to DSL.
Prompt in
Build a branching scenario for secondary school teachers: a Year 9 pupil starts to disclose a safeguarding concern at the end of a lunchtime club. Practise listening without leading questions, reassuring without promising confidentiality, recording what was said accurately, and reporting to the designated safeguarding lead in line with Keeping Children Safe in Education.
Inside this example
What the stored output shows
Curated for secondary school teachers with a intermediate learning curve.
5 interactive checkpoints across context, scenario graph, flashcard, question, decision, feedback.
One brief became a seven-node branching graph that tracks trust, evidence quality and risk, six flashcards on safe wording, and five scored checks across single-select, short-text, multi-select, ordering and consequence-based decision formats, with an 80% pass mark.
SCORM + hosted plus a reusable prompt seed for your review workflow.
Learning objectives
Section walkthrough
What the learner sees
Navigate through sections using the interactive preview above.9 screens with 5 interactive checkpoints.
Regulation context
Compliance references carried into the output
Related examples
Keep browsing adjacent use cases.

Academic Integrity and Responsible AI: Student Decisions in Practice
An interactive seminar example on academic integrity and responsible AI use for first-year undergraduates, with polls, paired discussion and scored checks.

First Seminar Spark: Names, Hopes, and Check-ins
An estimated ten-minute first-seminar icebreaker example that moves from names to module hopes and a participant-linked concerns check-in.
Build your own version
Start from this prompt and make it yours.
Use this as an illustrative starting point, then generate and review a version tailored to your team, policy context and delivery workflow.