AI scenario generator: decisions and branching paths
Intle turns a plain-language brief into a reviewable decision-led scenario with consequences, scored checks and explanatory feedback. A supported scenario graph can add multiple linked turns when selected; an ordinary decision is a separate, single-step activity. It is built for L&D teams, teacher trainers and compliance leads practising judgement. Download a SCORM 2004 or 1.2 zip for LMS testing, or share a hosted session link.
What to try and review
Practise a decision and compare the feedback for different choices.
Ordinary decisions show choice-specific consequences; a scenario graph is a separate supported activity. A branch does not imply persistent whole-course state.
Try two choices in the example. Check which graph and state behaviour your chosen delivery profile supports.
Start with a brief of up to 5,000 characters or supported source material. The upload controls show file type, size and extraction limits before generation. All accounts use the same creator toolkit; generation, editing, hosting and history allowances differ. Compare allowances.
A real generated scenario
Try the saved example and inspect its sections. Generated output needs author review; quality checks do not establish factual accuracy.
Interactive preview
Scenario · 9 sections · Fully interactive
A pupil asks you to keep a disclosure secret
- Stay calm and let the pupil speak in their own words.
- Do not promise confidentiality or start investigating.
- Record facts and report promptly to the DSL or deputy.
Teacher response from disclosure to report
A high-level path showing the immediate safeguarding actions expected when a pupil begins to disclose harm.
Read diagram as text
- Pupil starts talking leads to Listen calmly.
- Listen calmly leads to Reassure support.
- Reassure support leads to Explain no secrecy.
- Explain no secrecy leads to Record exact words.
- Record exact words leads to Report to DSL.
What this format can include
Branching when the planned activity calls for it
The saved safeguarding example has a seven-node graph with trust, evidence-quality and risk variables; one choice changes those values and can steer the ending. A new scenario may instead use single-step decisions. Check the planned activity and its delivery support rather than assuming every choice persists whole-course state.
Graded consequence decisions
The saved example gives choices written consequences and grades them from optimal to dangerous, including plausible but slow responses. It references Keeping Children Safe in Education. Review the applicability and accuracy of every regulated recommendation before use.
Scored checks across varied response modes
The example includes five scored checks spanning single-select, short-text fill-the-gap (with accepted alternative answers), multi-select, ordering and a consequence-based decision. Every one carries an explanation of why the answer is right plus a named common mistake.
Flashcard decks for language rehearsal
The saved example includes six shuffled flashcards contrasting neutral prompts ("Can you say more?") with leading or blaming phrases ("Did he hit you again?"), each with a hint. A new scenario's section mix follows its reviewed plan.
Built-in visuals, not stock images
Flowcharts, comparison tables and timelines are generated as part of the content. The example includes escalation-route flowcharts, a neutral-versus-leading wording table and a four-step post-disclosure timeline, each tied to the section it supports.
A pass mark for hosted or SCORM reporting
The saved example sets an 80% pass mark across five scored sections. A SCORM export writes supported scored checks to the SCORM interaction and score fields; test which item-level results your LMS accepts and displays for the chosen version.
Learners don't just read. They act.
Every experience is composed from interactive moments, chosen to fit what you’re teaching:
Deliver it your way
Host it live
Build a session and share a link or QR code. Learners can join in a browser, phones included, with nothing to install. Review the participation and responses recorded for that hosted session; learner-level detail depends on the joining and privacy settings.
Download it for your platform
Download a package for your LMS and test that exact file in its player. The recording shows one Blackboard walkthrough. Completion and score reporting depend on the receiving platform and its configuration.
Check dated LMS evidence and test guidanceHow it works
- 1
Describe the situation
Write a brief in plain language (up to 5,000 characters) and optionally attach source material such as PDF, DOCX, PPTX, images or a URL. The saved safeguarding example began as a single paragraph naming the audience, the moment and the behaviours to practise.
- 2
Review the structure before generation
Intle proposes the scenario's sections, decisions and scored checks. If a supported graph is in the plan, review its intended branches too. Adjust the plan before full content generation, then check the resulting path and feedback in preview.
- 3
Generation with quality gates
The scenario planner aims for 70% interactive sections, while the blocking screen-count floor is 50% because one graph can contain several decisions. Plan and content checks also inspect visuals and section variety; blocking failures may trigger regeneration or stop delivery, while advisory findings remain for review.
- 4
Deliver as SCORM or a hosted link
Download a zip targeting SCORM 2004 (4th Edition) or SCORM 1.2, or share a hosted session link that needs no LMS. Dated package-level results and current per-platform validation status are published on our LMS compatibility page.
What teams build with it
- Safeguarding disclosure practice for secondary school teachers, rehearsing a Year 9 pupil's first words through to the DSL handoff before it happens for real
- Feedback and conflict conversations for first-time managers, built by L&D teams as part of new-manager development programmes
- Patient communication practice for healthcare educators, breaking bad news, anxious patients and shared decision-making, with branching consequences instead of scripts
- Complaint de-escalation practice for retail and support trainers, using a reviewed scenario graph when state changes and distinct endings serve the objective
Start from a template
Prefer a head start? These templates generate this content type from a suggested starting brief. Adapt it and review the result.
Handling a Safeguarding Disclosure
Branching scenario where school staff practise receiving a pupil's disclosure in line with KCSIE: listen, reassure, record and refer, with consequence feedback at every decision point.
Giving Effective Feedback
Branching scenario where managers practise delivering difficult feedback using the SBI model with realistic team dynamics.
Patient Communication Skills
Branching scenario on patient communication using the SPIKES protocol, with distress handling, health-literacy techniques and shared decision-making.
Frequently asked questions
Can I export a branching scenario as SCORM?
Yes. Scenario content can be exported as SCORM 2004 (4th Edition) or SCORM 1.2. If the reviewed content contains a supported graph, its learner interaction is packaged; a single-step decision does not become a graph. Scored checks use SCORM interaction fields, but verify score and response reporting in your LMS.
Which LMS platforms are supported?
Packages target the SCORM 2004 4th Edition and SCORM 1.2 specifications. We publish dated package-level results and the honest per-platform status on our LMS compatibility page rather than claiming blanket support; check the exact build and your platform before rollout.
Can I edit the branches and decision points after generation?
Yes. Review the planned decisions and any graph before generation, then edit supported nodes, choices, consequences, questions and scoring fields in the visual editor. Preview both paths after a material change. Export a new SCORM zip after editing and replace the earlier LMS upload.
How does scoring work in a branching scenario?
In the saved graph, trust, evidence quality and risk affect the ending. Separately, five scored checks feed its 80% pass mark. A new scenario may use only ordinary decisions rather than a stateful graph. Exported scores use SCORM fields; confirm what your LMS records and displays.
Is there a free plan?
Yes. You can generate unwatermarked scenario packages on the free plan. Paid plans add monthly creation and hosting capacity.
Generate and review your own draft
Describe what you want to teach. Download a SCORM package for your LMS or share a hosted session link. It is free to start, with no card required.